ABSTRACT
The Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria 1999 chose certain rights to protect under chapter IV and termed them as Fundamental Rights. These rights are chosen to be protected not only by the Constitution, but also by the African Charter on Human and Peoples „Right. Whenever there are breaches of these fundamental rights, the law provides a procedure for their enforcement, which is the Fundamental Rights (Enforcement Procedure) Rules 2009. The basic objective of the 2009 Rules is to facilitate enforcement procedure by removing some of the impediments in 1979 rule. Unfortunately it is clear that the procedure for enforcement of Fundamental Rights is still bedeviled by delay. Many applications alleging serious human rights violations are routinely struck out or dismissed. However, the pertinent question is: to what extent are the human rights provision in these legal instruments realized or enforced? It is worthy of note that there are equally other important impediments in the realization of the objective of Fundamental Rights (Enforcement Procedure) Rules 2009, such as the distinction between main claim and ancillary claim in the Nigerian fundamental rights, because litigants are cautious of whether or not their claim will succeed because of this distinction. This research examines the problem of delay associated with the Fundamental Rights (Enforcement Procedure) Rules 2009 This dissertation made an in depth analysis of the rules and considered to what extent it achieved its objective in order to enhance a robust human right regime. To achieve a close –to- accurate‟ if not accurate result, the research embarked on a field work. To this end, both doctrinal and empirical method of research is used. This research found out that the Fundamental Rights (Enforcement Procedure) Rules 2009, though has brought tremendous changes in the field of human rights protection (e.g the abolishment of locus standi and leave, is still faced with some major setback like the issue of principal and ancillary claim in the enforcement of fundamental rights and the jurisdiction of the National Industrial Court which is not clear in the rule. The work recommend that Courts should do away with the dichotomy between principal and ancillary and the definition of courts in the Rule should include the National Industrial Court.
Abstract
This is study is on the role of small and medium scale enterprises in unemployment reduction in Nigeria....
ABSTRACT
This study assessed the Influence of income and savings on purchasing behaviour of working class Women in Niger State. The study...
ABSTRACT
The critical causes on why financing small and medium scale industries by microfinance banks in Nigeria have no...
ABSTRACT
The aim of the study was to evaluate the neurobehavioural patterns, cognitive functions and haemato-biochemical changes followin...
ABSTRACT
This research work assess the impact of sales promotion on organizational performance. A case...
Excerpt from the Study
Internal combustion engine lubricants supposed to be eco-friendly. Their production and use shoul...
Background of the study
A sentence may be thought of as an anthology of words that together communicate meaning and mean...
ABSTRACT
In this study internal control as an aid to accountability in the public sector was researched on using Biase local government a...
ABSTRACT
Human resource is the livewire of any organisation. Its effective management is very crucial and central in the achievement of o...
OBJECTIVE OF THE STUDY
The main objective of this study is to design an account holder’s information system for Mi...